Lichens Pan-Z (2007) - Flora of New Zealand Lichens - Revised Second Edition Pan-Z
Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Ramalina Ach.

RAMALINA Ach. in Luyken,  1809  nom. cons. 

Type : Ramalina fraxinea (L.) Ach. [=Lichen fraxineus L.,  typ. cons. ]

Description : Flora (1985: 496).

Key

1
Thallus inflated
2
Thallus solid
5
2
Thallus without soredia; corticolous
3
Thallus sorediate; saxicolous
3
Apothecia concave; apices sparingly branched
4
Apothecia convex at maturity, margins occluded; apices highly branched
4
Thallus slender, somewhat inflated, perforations small and slit-like; containing salazinic acid
Thallus broad, highly inflated; without salazinic acid
5
Thallus sorediate
6
Thallus not sorediate
12
6
Soredia erupting through lower surface and apices
7
Soredia in well-defined soralia
8
7
Variable in form, often numerous branches finely branched at tips, without marginal splitting to release soredia
Branches few, soft-textured; soredia released by marginal splitting and from lower surface
8
Branches terete or subterete (older branches somewhat flattened); branching irregular
9
Branches flat; soralia ellipsoidal or rounded; branching dichotomous
10
9
Soralia punctiform on minute lateral branches; medulla UV−, sekikaic acid aggregate present
Soralia spreading, often labriform at apices; medulla UV+ white, evernic and obtusatic acids present
10
Thalli more than 4 cm tall; sparsely branched
11
Thalli less than 4 cm tall, often densely branched; soralia with small fibrils at margin [South I.]
11
Branches narrow, extreme elongations between dichotomies; sekikaic acid present; [Kermadec Is]
Branches compressed; soralia with prominent margins; sekikaic acid absent, salazinic and protocetraric acids present
12
Branches terete to subterete, narrow
13
Branches distinctly flattened, broad or narrow
15
13
Thallus large; apothecia when present lateral
14
Thallus small; branches extremely fine; apothecia common, geniculate
14
Thallus more densely branched at base, apical branches often twisted and somewhat nodular; medulla K+ red (norstictic acid)
Thallus more densely branched at apices, many secondary branches at right angles to main branches; medulla K−
15
Apothecia terminal or subterminal
16
Apothecia laminal or marginal
16
Branches flat, often canaliculate, with prominent marginal and laminal pseudocyphellae; apothecia concave with pseudocyphellae on exciple; sekikaic acid absent
Branches never canaliculate, sometimes terete and appearing slightly inflated, pseudocyphellae rare; apothecia concave to plane,without pseudocyphellae on exciple; sekikaic acid present

Ramalina is a large genus of cosmopolitan lichens with some 200 species currently recognised (Kirk et al. 2001; Kashiwadani & Nash 2004), and is included in the family Ramalinaceae (Eriksson et al. 2004; Pennycook & Galloway 2004; Eriksson 2005). The genus is characterised by usually having pale yellow-green, flattened strap-like branches with small disc-like or cup-shaped apothecia. In New Zealand the genus is widespread and easily identified, being found on both native and introduced trees and shrubs in suburban gardens, forest margins and on scrub and on rocks in coastal localities. It appears to be absent from large parts of the country – much of Stewart I., and Fiordland, for example, being "Ramalina deserts" (Bannister 1998; Bannister et al. 2004), and several widespread species are undoubtedly introduced weeds. Species distinction has always been problematical in the genus. A preliminary introductory account (Galloway 1985a) discussed nine species, but many taxonomic difficulties remained unaddressed because of poor or inadequate collections. A later monograph (Blanchon et al. 1996a) based on adequate field studies supplemented with chemotaxonomic and SEM data, recognised 18 taxa. Additional details of southern distributions are given in Bannister (1998) and additional taxa are discussed in Bannister & Blanchon (2002, 2003) and Blanchon & Bannister (2002, 2004). Currently, 17 species are accepted for New Zealand and detailed distribution maps of 14 of these, with notes on possible ecological factors influencing their distributions, is presented by Bannister et al. (2004). A fertile, non-sorediate taxon [cf. R. microspora Kremp.] is also known from coastal lava outcrops in scrub from Raoul I. in the Kermadecs (Bannister & Blanchon 2003), but its exact status is still in doubt and it is not included here. Useful information on the genus is also found in the treatments of Stevens (1987, 1991b) for Australasian and Pacific tropical taxa; Swinscow & Krog (1988) for East African taxa; Kashiwadani & Nash (2004) for Sonoran Desert taxa; Kashiwadani (1990) for Chilean species; Kashiwadani & Kalb (1993) and Cordeiro et al. (2004) for Brazilian taxa; Rosata & Scutari (2000) for taxa in Argentina; Álvarez et al. (2001) for taxa in Spain; Kashiwadani & Nash (2002) for new species from Mexico, and Kashiwadani et al. (2002) for new species in Hawai'i.

Click to go back to the top of the page
Top